Reduce Manual Steps in your Lab with Power Express V5.0

Learn how the most recent release of Power Express (V5.0) can help achieve consistent turnaround times and drive safety improvements in your laboratory.
Reduce Manual Steps in your Lab with Power Express V5.0

Customers Talked

Increases in length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department (ED) are linked to lower patient satisfaction levels and increased expenditures, which can reduce overall profitability for hospitals.1,2 Various studies suggested a positive correlation between overall sample turnaround time (TAT), from blood draw to receipt of results, and LOS.3,4 While not the only factor impacting LOS, sample TAT continues to be a commonly measured indicator of laboratory performance.5,6

Automation across various points in the hospital has been instrumental in driving consistent TATs and reducing the number of manual steps performed by staff members.7,8 As an example, hospitals have invested in tube transport systems (such as pneumatic tube systems) to minimize the need for laboratory technicians to walk between the laboratories and ED wards to retrieve samples.7

Though tube transport systems have automated delivery of tubes to a centralized location within the laboratory, manual steps may still be required (for example, sample registration) before the sample can be introduced onto Total Laboratory Automation (TLA) for testing. These additional steps, which require sample handling, have the potential to increase TAT variability and expose staff to biohazards.9 To minimize idle time after sample arrival in the laboratory, one potential solution is to have a laboratory technician readily available to retrieve tubes from receiving stations at all times; however, this is an unrealistic expectation as laboratories are confronted with a growing shortage of trained staff.10

Our customers, who have invested in tube transport systems, have expressed that there would be value in automating sample delivery from tube transport systems or sample registration stations to the Power Express. Their belief, which is supported in studies, is that reducing manual steps, specifically during the pre-analytical testing phase, contributes to consistent TAT and improved safety measures—especially during peak workloads when laboratories are stressed.9,11

We Listened

To help our customers improve laboratory workflow, we have launched the Sample Tube Feeder connection with the recent release of Power Express (v5.0). The Sample Tube Feeder connection, an enhancement to the Bulk Inlet module, gives customers an option to connect the Power Express to third-party tube transport systems (including pneumatic tube systems and band conveyer systems) for touchless introduction of samples onto the Power Express.

With this connection, hospitals can deliver up to 700 STAT samples per hour from patient bedside or sample registration stations into the bulk inlet, leaving laboratories well-equipped to manage peak workloads. As an added benefit, while tubes are introduced into one of two bulk inlet entry bins, users have the flexibility to continue introducing tubes to the Power Express using the bulk inlet’s second bin or the dynamic inlet’s racks.* Users also have the flexibility to change loading priority (which bin or rack will load to the Power Express track first) to quickly adapt to fluctuations in tube arrival patterns, while still achieving a maximum throughput of 1450 samples/hour.

This feature can be suitable for various workflows in inpatient and outpatient settings. In situations where sample registration is not needed within the laboratory, samples can be introduced directly from tube transport systems into the bulk inlet through the Sample Tube Feeder connection, potentially allowing for touchless sample delivery from blood draw stations to the Power Express.

 

Alternatively, if sample registration is needed within the laboratory, the Sample Tube Feeder connection enables touchless delivery from sample registration stations to the Power Express.

With sample tube feeder, tubes are registered & placed on a conveyer belt for touchless introduction 

By reducing the number of manual steps, the Bulk Inlet and Sample Tube Feeder connection positions laboratories to achieve consistent sample TAT, improve safety within the lab, and positively impact patient LOS. To learn more about the Bulk Inlet and Sample Tube Feeder connection, please contact your local Beckman Coulter Sales Representative or visit the Power Express webpage.

*bulk inlet can be used for unspun samples only

Beckman Coulter does not manufacture or distribute tube transport systems (for example, Pneumatic tube systems or band conveyer transport systems). Please contact your tube transport system vendor to discuss third-party requirements for connecting to the Power Express Sample Tube Feeder connection.

REFERENCES

1 Foley M, Kifaieh N, Mallon WK. “Financial Impact of Emergency Department Crowding.” West J Emerg Med, vol. 12, no. 2, 2011, pp. 192–197.

2 Handel DA et al. “Associations Between Patient and Emergency Department Operational Characteristics and Patient Satisfaction Scores in an Adult Population.” Ann Emerg Med, vol. 64, no. 4, 2014, pp. 604–608.

3 Kaushik N et al. "Reduction in laboratory Turnaround Time Decreases Emergency Room Length of Stay.” Open Access Emerg Med, vol. 10, pp. 37–45.

4 Storrow AB et al. “Decreasing Lab Turnaround Time Improves Emergency Department Throughput and Decrease Emergency Medical Services Diversion: A Simulation Model.” Acad Emerg Med, vol. 15, no. 11, 2008, 2018, pp. 1130–1135.

5 Shilpasree AS et al. “Effectiveness of Implementing Process Improvement Strategies on Turnaround Time of Emergency Investigations, in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory.” Indian J Med Biochem, vol. 23, no. 2, 2019, pp. 287–292.

6 Van der Veen D et al. “Independent Determinants of Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Prospective Cohort Study.” Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, vol. 26, no. 1, 2018, p. 81.

7 Kapoula GV, Kontou PI, Bagos PG. “The Impact of Pneumatic Tube System on Routine Laboratory Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Clin Chem Lab Med, vol. 55, no. 12, 2017, pp. 1834–1844.

8 Yeo CP, Ng WY. “Automation and Productivity in the Clinical Laboratory: Experience of a Tertiary Healthcare Facility.” Singapore Med J, vol. 59, no. 11, 2018, pp. 597–601.

9 Da Rin G. “Pre-analytical Workstations as a Tool for Reducing Laboratory Errors.” J Med Biochem, vol. 29, no. 4, 2010, pp. 315–324.

10 The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science. “Addressing the Clinical Laboratory Workforce Shortage.” https://www.ascls.org/position-papers/321-laboratory-workforce/440-addressing-the-clinical-laboratory-workforce-shortage, 2 Aug. 2018. Accessed 1 June 2020.

11 Streitberg GS et al. “Automation and Expert Systems in a Core Clinical Chemistry Laboratory.” JALA, vol. 14, 2009, pp. 94–105.

Varun Agarwal
Varun Agarwal
Varun Agarwal is a Global Product Manager for the Workflow and Information Technology Solutions Business Unit at Beckman Coulter, where he leads global commercialization efforts for the Power Express.

Related Articles

The evolution of high-sensitivity HIV diagnostic testing

The evolution of high-sensitivity HIV diagnostic testing

High-sensitivity diagnostic immunoassay testing is vital for meeting the increased HIV testing demands and enabling earlier treatment, which may curb viral transmissions by detecting infections sooner.
New PLA Code for Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) Marker

New PLA Code for Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) Marker

The American Medical Association designated MDW with a PLA code. This important milestone reflects the proprietary and novel aspects of MDW as a marker of severity of infection.
What is Sensitivity vs Specificity?

What is Sensitivity vs Specificity?

Sensitivity vs specificity, PPV/NPV, and likelihood ratios are vital indicators for accurate clinical decisions. Learn the basics!